Three reasons why making your own honeypot or honeynet might be a bad idea.
Chapter 06 RWE6.1:Do a Web search for “cyber kill chain in breach responses.” Look for an article that pointsout weaknesses in using the cyber kill chain. What are the one or two deficiencies of the cyberkill chain that are pointed out in the article? Show
Get answer to your question and much more What is a HoneypotA honeypot is a security mechanism that creates a virtual trap to lure attackers. An intentionally compromised computer system allows attackers to exploit vulnerabilities so you can study them to improve your security policies. You can apply a honeypot to any computing resource from software and networks to file servers and routers. Honeypots are a type of deception technology that allows you to understand attacker behavior patterns. Security teams can use honeypots to investigate cybersecurity breaches to collect intel on how cybercriminals operate. They also reduce the risk of false positives, when compared to traditional cybersecurity measures, because they are unlikely to attract legitimate activity. Honeypots vary based on design and deployment models, but they are all decoys intended to look like legitimate, vulnerable systems to attract cybercriminals. Production vs. Research HoneypotsThere are two primary types of honeypot designs:
Types of Honeypot DeploymentsThere are three types of honeypot deployments that permit threat actors to perform different levels of malicious activity:
Honeypot LimitationsHoneypot security has its limitations as the honeypot cannot detect security breaches in legitimate systems, and it does not always identify the attacker. There is also a risk that, having successfully exploited the honeypot, an attacker can move laterally to infiltrate the real production network. To prevent this, you need to ensure that the honeypot is adequately isolated. To help scale your security operations, you can combine honeypots with other techniques. For example, the canary trap strategy helps find information leaks by selectively sharing different versions of sensitive information with suspected moles or whistleblowers. Honeynet: A Network of HoneypotsA honeynet is a decoy network that contains one or more honeypots. It looks like a real network and contains multiple systems but is hosted on one or only a few servers, each representing one environment. For example, a Windows honeypot machine, a Mac honeypot machine and a Linux honeypot machine. A “honeywall” monitors the traffic going in and out of the network and directs it to the honeypot instances. You can inject vulnerabilities into a honeynet to make it easy for an attacker to access the trap. Example of a honeynet topology Any system on the honeynet may serve as a point of entry for attackers. The honeynet gathers intelligence on the attackers and diverts them from the real network. The advantage of a honeynet over a simple honeypot is that it feels more like a real network, and has a larger catchment area. This makes honeynet a better solution for large, complex networks – it presents attackers with an alternative corporate network which can represent an attractive alternative to the real one. Spam Trap: An Email HoneypotSpam traps are fraud management tools that help Internet Service Providers (ISPs) identify and block spammers. They help make your inbox safer by blocking vulnerabilities. A spam trap is a fake email address used to bait spammers. Legitimate mail is unlikely to be sent to a fake address, so when an email is received, it is most likely spam. Types of spam traps include:
Spam trap vulnerabilities include generating backscatter (incorrectly automated bounce messages) and tainting legitimate email addresses that reply to or forward the message. Moreover, once the spam trap has been exposed, it spammers can exploit it by sending legitimate content to it, causing the spam trap to lose its efficacy. Another risk is that some people may write to an address without realizing that it is a spam trap. Accidentally hitting a spam trap can damage your organization by affecting your reputation and deliverability. An ISP might block or blacklist your IP address and companies that consult anti-spam databases will filter your emails. Imperva Application SecurityOur internal security team maintains the Imperva application security stack and conducts research on new and growing threats. The security team maintains your WAF, continuously updates security policies, identifies new vulnerabilities and threats, and creates custom rules according to your needs. Instead of using traditional honeypots we leverage learning and findings from attacks seen across hundreds of thousands of Imperva protected domains, to deepen our understanding of threats in the wild. This research informs our multi-layered protection solution. Imperva’s multi-layered protection for websites and applications ensures availability, security, and usability. Imperva application security solutions include cloud and gateway web application firewalls (WAFs), a developer-friendly content distribution network (CDN) for improved performance, protection against distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, attack analytics to respond to actual security threats, and more. Why making your own honeypot or honeynet might be a bad idea?Once a honeypot has been 'fingerprinted', an attacker can create spoofed attacks to distract attention from a real exploit being targeted against your production systems. They can also feed bad information to the honeypot. Worse still, a smart attacker could potentially use a honeypot as a way into your systems.
Are there any dangers to using honeypots?The greatest disadvantage of honeypots is they have a narrow field of view: They only see what activity is directed against them. If an attacker breaks into your network and attacks a variety of systems, your honeypot will be blissfully unaware of the activity unless it is attacked directly.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of honeypot?Honeypots add complexity to a network, and the more complex a network is, the harder it is to secure. The honeypot could introduce vulnerabilities that could be exploited to gain access to real systems and data. Finally, the honeypot can only tell you about an attack in progress if the honeypot is directly attacked.
What are the reasons we should avoid using Honeynets?As a honeynet cannot detect attacks on legitimate systems, there is always the risk of an attacker moving laterally from the honeynet to a production network segment to penetrate the real network. To mitigate risk, it is best to isolate the honeynet network and monitor it proactively.
|