So sánh card amd 530 gb năm 2024
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Show
Pipelines / CUDA cores2424Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHzBoost clock speed1150 MHz1050 MHzNumber of transistors189 million189 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 WattTexture fill rate27.6025.20Floating-point performance403.2 gflopsno data Size and compatibilityInformation on HD Graphics 530 and HD Graphics 520 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x1 MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4Maximum RAM amount64 GB32 GBMemory bus width64/128 Bit64/128 BitMemory clock speedSystem SharedSystem SharedShared memory++ Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.64.6OpenCL2.12.1Vulkan++ Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. HD Graphics 530 2.58 +20.6% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 21% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% HD Graphics 530 1001 +20.5% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 20% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 530 6831 +19.4% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 19% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% HD Graphics 530 1362 +5.3% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 5% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 530 935 +16.4% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 16% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% HD Graphics 530 7500 +11.9% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 12% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% HD Graphics 530 80242 +8.9% HD Graphics 530 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 9% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p24−27 20 Full HD14 11 4K7 5−6 Performance in popular gamesFull HD Low Preset Cyberpunk 20775−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Full HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Battlefield 55−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +9.1% 10−12 −9.1% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Far Cry 56 +200% 2−3 −200% Far Cry New Dawn3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Forza Horizon 48−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Hitman 35−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Horizon Zero Dawn3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Shadow of the Tomb Raider8−9 +0% 8−9 +0% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Battlefield 55−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare12−14 +9.1% 10−12 −9.1% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Far Cry 53−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Far Cry New Dawn3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Forza Horizon 48−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% Hitman 35−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Horizon Zero Dawn3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Metro Exodus3−4 +0% 3−4 +0% Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +20% 5−6 −20% Shadow of the Tomb Raider8−9 +0% 8−9 +0% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt5 +25% 4 −25% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey3−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Battlefield 55−6 +66.7% 3−4 −66.7% Cyberpunk 20775−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Far Cry 53−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Far Cry New Dawn3−4 +200% 1−2 −200% Forza Horizon 48−9 +33.3% 6−7 −33.3% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt3 −66.7% 5−6 +66.7% Watch Dogs: Legion0−1 0−1 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare5−6 +25% 4−5 −25% Hitman 35−6 +0% 5−6 +0% Horizon Zero Dawn8−9 +0% 8−9 +0% Metro Exodus1−2 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 21−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Shadow of the Tomb Raider5−6 +0% 5−6 +0% 1440p Ultra Preset Cyberpunk 20771−2 +0% 1−2 +0% Far Cry 53−4 +0% 3−4 +0% Forza Horizon 42−3 1−2 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare2−3 +0% 2−3 +0% Hitman 33−4 +50% 2−3 −50% Horizon Zero Dawn6−7 +0% 6−7 +0% Red Dead Redemption 21−2 +0% 1−2 +0% 4K Ultra Preset Far Cry 53−4 +0% 3−4 +0% Far Cry New Dawn6−7 5−6 Forza Horizon 42−3 +0% 2−3 +0% This is how HD Graphics 530 and HD Graphics 520 compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 2.58 2.14 Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 32 GB The HD Graphics 530 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 520 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 520 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate Intel HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate Intel HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |