So sánh mx250 và gtx 1050 năm 2024
|
Sau nhiều lần gây thất vọng ở dòng card màn hình MX250 và MX350, Nvidia cuối cùng cũng khiến người dùng phải đứng ngồi không yên với dòng card đồ hoạ MX450 của mình. Đây Show
Vào thời điểm 3 năm trước, khi Nvidia quyết định tung ra dòng card đồ hoạ MX150 nhằm thay thế cho GT 940MX vốn đã cũ kỹ. Dòng card đồ hoạ này đã gây được tiếng vang lớn nhờ sử dụng kiến trúc Pascal mới nhất vào thời điểm đó, thay vì Maxwell như thường lệ. MX150 được đánh giá là có hiệu năng mạnh hơn GTX 950M và chỉ kém 10% so với GTX 960M vào lúc đó, cho dù chỉ tiêu thụ 25W điện. Không có một card đồ hoạ tích hợp nào của Intel hay AMD (với Radeon R7) có thể vượt qua được MX150. Thế nhưng, cho tới những phiên bản sau như MX250 và MX350 thì lại không gây được tiếng vang như người đàn anh. Thực tế cho thấy, MX150 thậm chí còn cho hiệu năng tốt hơn so với MX250. Thêm vào đó, hệ thống card đồ hoạ tích hợp của AMD còn vượt qua cả MX150. Sự xuất hiện cùng lúc của Intel Iris Xe và AMD Radeon Mobile Renoir là mối đe doạ rất lớn với những dòng card đồ hoạ kể trên. Nhưng cục diện đã thay đổi khi MX450 xuất hiện vào năm nay. Nvidia quyết định thay đổi hoàn toàn kiến trúc Pascal được dùng trên MX150/250/350 và thay bằng Turing. Theo như những thông số được công bố trước đó, MX450 có hiệu năng gần bằng với GTX 1050, trong khi điện năng tiêu thụ cũng chỉ vào 25W điện. Với những thông số vô cùng khả quan như vậy, người dùng sẽ muốn nán lại đợi những dòng laptop được trang bị MX450, hơn là vội vàng mua những laptop sử dụng các phiên bản card đồ hoạ MX trước đó. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Pipelines / CUDA cores640384CUDA cores640no dataCore clock speed1354 MHz1518 MHzBoost clock speed1493 MHz1582 MHzNumber of transistors3,300 million1,800 millionManufacturing process technology14 nm14 nmPower consumption (TDP)75 Watt10/25 WattMaximum GPU temperature97 °Cno dataTexture fill rate59.7224.91 Size and compatibilityInformation on GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile and GeForce MX250 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Laptop sizelargelargeBus supportPCIe 3.0no dataInterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4Supplementary power connectorsno dataNoneSLI options-no data MemoryParameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5Maximum RAM amount4000 MB4 GBMemory bus width128 Bit64 BitMemory clock speed7008 MHz7000 MHzMemory bandwidth112 GB/s48.06 GB/sShared memory-- Video outputs and portsTypes and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputsMulti monitor support+no dataHDCP2.2no dataG-SYNC support+no data TechnologiesSupported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. GameStream+no dataGPU Boost3.0no dataAnsel+no data API supportList of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)Shader Model6.46.4OpenGL4.54.6OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.2.1311.2CUDA+6.1 Synthetic benchmark performanceNon-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. Combined synthetic benchmark scoreThis is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. GTX 1050 Mobile 11.50 +83.4% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 83% in our combined benchmark results. PassmarkThis is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% GTX 1050 Mobile 4461 +83.4% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 83% in Passmark. 3DMark Vantage Performance3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1050 Mobile 26560 +61.1% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 61% in 3DMark Vantage Performance. 3DMark 11 Performance GPU3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% GTX 1050 Mobile 7693 +66% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 66% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU. 3DMark Fire Strike GraphicsFire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1050 Mobile 6068 +65.8% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 66% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics. 3DMark Cloud Gate GPUCloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% GTX 1050 Mobile 38042 +76.6% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 77% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU. 3DMark Ice Storm GPUIce Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% GTX 1050 Mobile 287287 +22% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 22% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU. Unigine Heaven 3.0This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine. Benchmark coverage: 4% GTX 1050 Mobile 78 +79.6% GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms MX250 by 80% in Unigine Heaven 3.0. Gaming performanceLet's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Average FPS across all PC gamesHere are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: 900p73 +109% 35−40 −109% Full HD46 +100% 23 −100% 1440p24 +100% 12−14 −100% 4K15 +87.5% 8−9 −87.5% Performance in popular gamesFull HD Medium Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey37 +94.7% 19 −94.7% Battlefield 551 +113% 24 −113% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare40 +73.9% 23 −73.9% Far Cry 539 +105% 19 −105% Far Cry New Dawn38 +81% 21 −81% Forza Horizon 455 +77.4% 31 −77.4% Red Dead Redemption 227 +92.9% 14 −92.9% Shadow of the Tomb Raider33 +83.3% 18 −83.3% Full HD High Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey30 +131% 13 −131% Battlefield 544 +132% 19 −132% Call of Duty: Modern Warfare33 +106% 16 −106% Far Cry 536 +112% 17 −112% Far Cry New Dawn37 +106% 18 −106% Forza Horizon 452 +117% 24 −117% Metro Exodus19 +171% 7 −171% Red Dead Redemption 214 +75% 8 −75% Shadow of the Tomb Raider29 +164% 11 −164% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt39 +85.7% 21 −85.7% Full HD Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey18 +157% 7 −157% Battlefield 537 +164% 14 −164% Far Cry 533 +106% 16 −106% Far Cry New Dawn33 +94.1% 17 −94.1% Forza Horizon 437 +131% 16 −131% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt22 +83.3% 12 −83.3% 1440p High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare18 +80% 10−11 −80% Metro Exodus11 +175% 4−5 −175% Red Dead Redemption 28−9 +100% 4−5 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider17 +88.9% 9−10 −88.9% 1440p Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey13 +225% 4−5 −225% Battlefield 526 +420% 5−6 −420% Far Cry 521 +133% 9−10 −133% Far Cry New Dawn24 +243% 7−8 −243% Forza Horizon 426 +160% 10−11 −160% 4K High Preset Call of Duty: Modern Warfare10 +150% 4−5 −150% Metro Exodus7 0−1 Red Dead Redemption 26−7 +100% 3−4 −100% Shadow of the Tomb Raider8 +300% 2−3 −300% The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9−10 +350% 2−3 −350% 4K Ultra Preset Assassin's Creed Odyssey7 +250% 2−3 −250% Battlefield 513 +550% 2−3 −550% Far Cry 511 +120% 5−6 −120% Far Cry New Dawn11 +37.5% 8−9 −37.5% Forza Horizon 415 +114% 7−8 −114% This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and GeForce MX250 compete in popular games: 900p resolution:
1080p resolution:
1440p resolution:
4K resolution:
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
All in all, in popular games:
Advantages and disadvantagesPerformance score 11.50 6.27 Recency 3 January 2017 20 February 2019 Memory bus width 128 64 Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 4 GB Pipelines / CUDA cores 640 384 Memory bandwidth 112 48.06 Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 10 Watt The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX250 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Cast your own voteDo you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce MX250 Similar GPU comparisonsWe selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. User ratings: view and submitHere you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5: Questions and commentsHere you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. |
