Who were the authors of on the physical Mechanisms of Hysterical Phenomena published in 1893

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use

read more


CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *


Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.


Learn more

Complete book

  • Immediate access to all parts of this book
  • Cover-to-cover formats may be available
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restriction for personal use

read more


Pricing depends on hard-cover price


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Who were the authors of on the physical Mechanisms of Hysterical Phenomena published in 1893

Published online: June 26, 2014
Cover Date: 2014

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-318-02646-7 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-318-02647-4 (Online)

Abstract

Sigmund Freud developed a specific interest in hysteria after his stay with Professor Jean-Martin Charcot during the winter of 1885-1886, although his previous activity mainly consisted of neuropathology and general medical practice. Most of his initial studies on hysteria (hysteria in men, influence of subconscious ideas, role of traumas, and psychological and sexual factors) were indeed ‘borrowed' from Charcot and his immediate followers, such as Pierre Janet and Paul Richer. Subsequently, Freud developed with Breuer a theory of hysteria which encompassed a mixture of Janet's ‘fixed subconscious ideas' with the ‘pathological secret' concept of Moriz Benedikt. After their book Studies on Hysteria (1895), Freud interrupted his collaboration with Breuer and developed the concept of conversion of psychological problems into somatic manifestations, with a strong ‘sexualization' of hysteria. Firstly, he believed that actual abuses had occurred in these patients (the ‘seduction' theory), but then blamed them for having deceived him on that issue, so that he subsequently launched a ‘fantasy' theory to explain the development of hysterical symptoms without the necessity of actual abuses. Like many of his contemporaries, and contrary to his claims, Freud did not follow a scientific process of verified experiments, but rather adapted his theories to the evolution of his own beliefs on psychological conditions, selectively emphasizing the aspects of his ‘therapies' with patients which supported his emerging ideas, with often abrupt changes in theoretical interpretations. While it remains difficult to get a clear, synthetic vision of what was Freud's definite theory of hysteria, it is obvious that hysteria really was the origin of what would become Freud's psychoanalytical theory. Indeed, psychoanalysis appears to have been initially developed by him largely in order to absorb and explain his many changes in the interpretation of hysterical manifestations.

© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Carhart-Harris RL, Friston KJ: The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas. Brain 2010;133:1265-1283.
  2. Kandel ER: Biology and the future psychoanalysis: a new intellectual framework for psychiatry revisited. Am J Psychiatry 1999;156:505-524.
  3. Halligan PW, David S: Conversion hysteria: towards a cognitive neuropsychological account. Cogn Neuropsychiatry 1999;4:161-163.
  4. Oakley DA, Halligan PW: Hypnotic suggestion: opportunities for cognitive neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:565-576.
  5. Bogousslavsky J: Sigmund Freud's evolution from neurology to psychiatry: evidence from his La Salpêtrière library. Neurology 2011;77:1391-1394.
  6. Breuer J, Freud S: Studies on Hysteria. New York, Avon Books, 1895/1966.
  7. Sulloway FJ: Reassessing Freud's case histories. Isis 1991;82:245-275.
  8. Libbrecht K, Quackelbeen J: On the early history of male hysteria and psychic trauma: Charcot's influence on Freudian thought. J Hist Behav Sci 1995;31:370-384.
  9. Ellenberger HF: Histoire de la découverte de l'inconscient. Paris, Fayard, 1970.
  10. Freud S: Observation of a severe case of hemianesthesia in a hysterical male (1886); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1966, vol I, pp 23-31.
  11. Freud S: Hysteria. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol I (1886-1899): Pre-Psycho-Analytic Publications and Unpublished Drafts, 1888, pp 37-59.
  12. Freud S: Charcot. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol III (1893-1899): Early Psycho-Analytic Publications, 1893, pp 7-23.
  13. Bouchara C: Jean-Martin Charcot 1825-1893: did he anticipate Freud's first topology? Am J Psychiatry 2010;167:387.
  14. Breuer J, Freud S: On the psychical mechanism of hysterical phenomena: preliminary communication (initially published in Neurol Zentralbl 1893;XII:4-10, 43-47); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1966, vol II, pp 13-17.
  15. Freud S: Quelques considérations pour une étude comparative des paralysies motrices organiques et hystériques. Arch Neurol (Paris) 1893;26:29-43.
  16. Koehler PJ: Freud's comparative study of hysterical and organic paralyses: how Charcot's assignment turned out. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1646-1650.
  17. Stone J, Smyth R, Carson A, Warlow C, Sharpe M: La belle indifférence in conversion symptoms and hysteria: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:204-209.
  18. Freud S: Repression (1915); quoted in Laplanche J, Pontalis JB: Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris, PUF, 1967.
  19. Babinski J: Contribution à l'étude des troubles mentaux dans l'hémiplégie organique cérébrale (anosognosie). Rev Neurol 1914;27:845-848.
  20. de Marneffe D: Looking and listening: the construction of clinical knowledge in Charcot and Freud. Sign 1991;17:71-111.
  21. Freud S: Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895); quoted in Ellenberger HF: Histoire de la découverte de l'inconscient. Paris, Fayard, 1970.
  22. Lakoff G, Johnson M: Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, Basic Books, 1999.
  23. Allison DB, Roberts MS: On the constructing of the disorder hysteria. J Med Philos 1994;19:239-259.
  24. Freud S: Heredity and the aetiology of the neuroses (published originally in French in Revue Neurologique, March 1896); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1966, vol III, pp 143-156.
  25. Freud S: Further remarks on the neuro-psychoses of defence (published originally in Neurol Zentralbl 1896); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1966, vol III, pp 162-185.
  26. Freud S: The aetiology of hysteria (published originally in five weekly installments, May-June, 1896, in Wien Klin Rundsch); in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Work of Sigmund Freud. London, Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1966, vol III, pp 191-221.
  27. Gleaves DH, Hernandez E: Recent reformulations of Freud's development and abandonment of his seduction theory: historical/scientific clarification or a continued assault on truth? Hist Psychol 1999;2:324-354.
  28. Esterson A: Misconceptions about Freud's seduction theory: comment on Gleaves and Hernandez (1999). Hist Psychol 2002;5:85-91.
  29. Triplett H: The misnomer of Freud's ‘seduction theory'. J Hist Ideas 2004;65:647-665.
  30. Esterson A: The mythologizing of psychoanalytic history: deception and self-deception in Freud's accounts of the seduction theory episode. Hist Psychiat 2001;12:329-352.
  31. Esterson A: Jeffrey Masson and Freud's seduction theory: a new fable based on old myths. Hist Hum Sci 1998;11:1-21.
  32. Borch-Jacobsen M: Neurotica: Freud and the seduction theory. October (MIT Press) 1996;76:15-43.
  33. Esterson A: The myth of Freud's ostracism by the medical community in 1896-1905: Jeffrey Masson's assault on truth. Hist Psychol 2002;5:115-134.
  34. Freud S: My Views on the Part Played by Sexuality in the Aetiology of the Neuroses (1906 [1905]). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol VII (1901-1905): A Case of Hysteria, Three Essays on Sexuality and Other Works, 1906, 269-279, p 274.
  35. Ahbel-Rappe K: ‘I no longer believe': did Freud abandon the seduction theory? J Am Psychoanal Assoc 2006;54:171-199.
  36. Freud S: An Autobiographical Study. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol XX (1925-1926): An Autobiographical Study, Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety, The Question of Lay Analysis and Other Works, 1925, 1-74, p 33.
  37. Huopainen H: Freud's view of hysteria in light of modern trauma research. Scand Psychoanal Rev 2002;25:92-107.
  38. Stadlen A: Was Dora ‘ill'? in Spurling L (ed): Freud: Critical Assessments. London, Routledge, 1989, vol 2, pp 196-203.
  39. Boudry M, Braeckman J: Immunization strategies and epistemic defense mechanisms. Philosophia 2011;39:145-161.
  40. Showalter E: Hystories: Hysterical Epidemics and Modern Culture. New York, Columbia University Press, 1997.
  41. du Preez A: Putting on appearances: mimetic representations of hysteria. De Arte 2004;69:47-61.


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Who were the authors of on the physical Mechanisms of Hysterical Phenomena published in 1893

Published online: June 26, 2014
Cover Date: 2014

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-318-02646-7 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-318-02647-4 (Online)

When did Freud discover hysteria?

Abstract. Sigmund Freud developed a specific interest in hysteria after his stay with Professor Jean-Martin Charcot during the winter of 1885-1886, although his previous activity mainly consisted of neuropathology and general medical practice.

Who studied hysteria?

Freud began working on this problem in collaboration with a close friend and colleague, Josef Breuer. Freud and Breuer developed a theory of hysteria in which they attributed certain forms of paralysis to psychological conflict rather than to physiological damage (Breuer & Freud, 1895/1955).

What did Freud say about hysteria?

To Freud, hysteria is a psychological disorder (Freud, 1901). He thought that hysteria is rooted in the repression of unpleasant emotions that caused by a traumatic event in the patient`s life.

How was Freud and Breuer Studies on hysteria important for the development of psychoanalysis?

Freud's recognition that hysteria stemmed from traumas in the patient's past transformed the way we think about sexuality. Studies in Hysteria is one of the founding texts of psychoanalysis, revolutionizing our understanding of love, desire, and the human psyche.