Sigma ex aspherical hsm 17-35mm đánh giá năm 2024

First of all, let’s take a look at the results for the Sigma lens by itself:Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon mounted on a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark IIIWith a DxO Mark Score of 20, this wide-angle zoom is indeed a good-quality lens.Strong pointsWeak pointsGood sharpnessSignificant vignetting at maximum apertureGood correction of chromatic aberrationRather weak transmissionVery reasonable price An acceptable weight ComparisonSigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM mounted on a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark IIIBoth lenses achieve the same DxOMark overall score of 20. When looking at the

The Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Lens review page is included for access to the ISO 12233 Crops and Vignetting results. I do not plan to review the Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Lens at this time.

Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. I am grateful for your support! - Bryan

Recommended

Lenses

There are 2089 lenses in our database and 3494 owners opinions.

Manufacturer Sigma Model 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical Lens style Wide angle zoom Focal length 17 - 35 mm Maximum aperture f/2.8 - 4 Angle of view 103.7 - 63.4 o Closest focusing distance 0.27 m Maximum magnification 1:4.5 Minimum aperture 45 Number of diaphragm blades 8 Auto focus type AF HSM Lens Construction 16 elements / 13 groups Filter diameter 77 mm Macro No Available mounts Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta Sigma Pentax K Dimensions 83.5 x 86.2 mm Weight 560 g Additional information No HSM in version for KM/Sony and Pentax/Samsung

Average rating (7 owners reviews)

Latest reviews

Latest articles

Latest owners opinions

This lens is good edge to edge when stopped down, even on full frame. This lens is good for every day landscape / architecture work. Color is good, with good deep blues. It is less saturated than the DG version. Contrast is slightly improved with a good modern multi coated UV filter.The lens is not brilliant wide open and probably wasn't meant to be. The Pentax 15-30 mm is, obviously, sharper on the edge at wider apertures, but how often do you need ultra wide angle and shallow depth of field?

Lenss > Sigma 17 35mm F28 4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon > Lens Test Results

First of all, let’s take a look at the results for the Sigma lens by itself:

Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon mounted on a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III

With a DxO Mark Score of 20, this wide-angle zoom is indeed a good-quality lens.

Comparison

Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM mounted on a Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III

Both lenses achieve the same DxOMark overall score of 20. When looking at the results a bit more closely, the Sigma’s quality seems actually somewhat lower (see also the DxOMark score map).

In fact, the Sigma’s performance drops off a bit for the greatest focal lengths (starting at 28 mm), due to the fact that the Sigma doesn’t maintain a constant f/2.8. To compensate for the loss of brightness, one must augment the ISO sensitivity – and consequently, noise goes up as well.

Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon

The advantages The disadvantages Homogenous sharpness in the field at maximum aperture An aperture that varies depending on the focal length Good correction of chromatic aberrations Very heterogenous optical quality A truly affordable lens in terms of price

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

The advantages The disadvantages Homogenous optical quality Good sharpness only in the first third of the field With a constant aperture, the Canon is brighter Very strong chromatic aberrations chromatiques in the corners at 16mm High price

Conclusion

The Sigma 17-35mm F2.8-4 EX DG Aspherical HSM Canon is a very good lens for the price. While each lens has its strong and weak points, the Sigma quite frankly manages to hold its own against its pricier Canon rival.