What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?

A second important point would be the ability of the predictable process to produce products which meet specification requirements.  It is quite possible for a process to be predictabally "bad"--that is, the process consistently produces products which fail to conform to the specifications.  The appropriate actions to take would be to recenter the process on the target value if necessary, and then determine the sources of the common cause variation in the system with the purpose of minimizing that variation (common cause variation can never be eliminated).  A reduction in the variation of a properly centered process will make the process more capable of producing products which meet specifications.  An alternative way to improve the capability of a process would be to expand the specification limits.  Often you will be constrained from doing this by customer requirements.

Statistical Process Control 101

Learn all about SPC for manufacturing.

Understanding Process VariationWilliam Edwards Deming (1900-1993) was an important contributor to statistical process control and its use in manufacturing. According to the American Society for Quality (ASQ), his 14 key points on quality management are a core part of modern quality management programs. 

Understanding process variation is an integral aspect of using Statistical Process Control (SPC) to improve your manufacturing processes. Dr. Deming’s first principle states, “The central problem in lack of quality is the failure of management to understand variation.” Only after management understands variation can a manufacturer succeed in implementing Dr. Deming’s second principle: “It is management’s responsibility to know whether the problems are in the system or in the behavior of the people.” 
 

Types of Process Variation

There are two types of process variation:
 
  • Common cause variation is inherent to the system. This variation can be changed only by improving the equipment or changing the work procedures; the operator has little influence over it.
  • Assignable cause variation comes from sources outside of the system. This variation can occur because of operator error, use of improper tooling, equipment malfunction, raw material problems, or any other abnormal disruptive inputs.

The goal of SPC is to understand the difference between these two types of process variation—and to react only to assignable cause variation. Processes that show primarily common cause variation are, by definition, in control and running as well as possible. 
 

Control versus capability

Note that keeping a process in control doesn’t mean that the product is acceptable; the system must also be capable of making acceptable products. Control and capability are different concepts.
 
SPC uses statistical tools—such as control charts—to identify process variations. Special cause variations—those outside the standard or expected variation—are identified and their causes need to be eliminated or at least understood. 
 

Example of special cause variation

Suppose you drive to work each day. Your path has inherent or common variations, such as traffic lights. But suppose there is a railroad crossing that causes you to be 30 minutes late for work. That day’s commute would be special variation, and the railroad crossing would be the assignable cause. 

As a result of understanding and reducing or eliminating assignable cause variations (perhaps there is a route with no railroad crossings), processes can be kept in control and continually improved. Adjusting an in-control process when there is no identified need is called tampering and only increases the variation of the system.
 

Next: The Problem with Tampering→

←Previous: SPC Implementation

  • Why Use SPC in Manufacturing?
  • Statistical Process Control (SPC) Implementation
  • Understanding Process Variation
  • The Problem with Tampering
  • Distributions
  • Populations and Sampling
  • Process Behavior and Control
  • Specification and Control Limits
  • SPC Control Charts
  • SPC Charting Examples
  • Capability and Cpk Manufacturing Charts
  • Overcoming Obstacles to Effective SPC
  • Statistical Process Control FAQs

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?

Take the first step from quality to excellence

REQUEST FREE TRIAL

CONTACT AN EXPERT

REQUEST A DEMO

Every piece of data which is measured will show some degree of variation: no matter how much we try, we could never attain identical results for two different situations - each result will be different, even if the difference is slight. Variation may be defined as “the numerical value used to indicate how widely individuals in a group vary.” 

In other words, variance gives us an idea of how data is distributed about an expected value or the mean. If you attain a variance of zero, it indicates that your results are identical - an uncommon condition. A high variance shows that the data points are spread out from each other—and the mean, while a smaller variation indicates that the data points are closer to the mean. Variance is always nonnegative.

Are you looking forward to making a mark in the Project Management field? If yes, enroll in the Project Management Fundamental Program now and get a step closer to your career goal!

Types of Variance

Change is inevitable, even in statistics. You’ll need to know what kind of variation affects your process because the course of action you take will depend on the type of variance. There are two types of Variance: Common Cause Variation and Special Cause Variation. You’ll need to know about Common Causes Variation vs Special Causes Variation because they are two subjects that are tested on the PMP Certification and CAPM Certification exams. 

  1. Common Cause Variation
  2. Special Cause Variation

Become a Product Leader in 6 Months

UMass PGP Project ManagementExplore Course

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?

Common Cause Variation

Common Cause Variation, also referred to as “Natural Problems, “Noise,” and “Random Cause” was a term coined by Harry Alpert in 1947. Common causes of variance are the usual quantifiable and historical variations in a system that are natural. Though variance is a problem, it is an inherent part of a process—variance will eventually creep in, and it is not much you can do about it. Specific actions cannot be taken to prevent this failure from occurring. It is ongoing, consistent, and predictable.

Characteristics of common causes variation are:

  • Variation predictable probabilistically
  • Phenomena that are active within the system
  • Variation within a historical experience base which is not regular
  • Lack of significance in individual high and low values

This variation usually lies within three standard deviations from the mean where 99.73% of values are expected to be found. On a control chart, they are indicated by a few random points that are within the control limit. These kinds of variations will require management action since there can be no immediate process to rectify it. You will have to make a fundamental change to reduce the number of common causes of variation. If there are only common causes of variation on your chart, your process is said to be “statistically stable.”

When this term is applied to your chart, the chart itself becomes fairly stable. Your project will have no major changes, and you will be able to continue process execution hassle-free.

Free Webinar: Creating Mindset for Career Success

Wednesday, 21 December | 9 PM ISTRegister Now

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?

Common Cause Variation Examples

Consider an employee who takes a little longer than usual to complete a specific task. He is given two days to do a task, and instead, he takes two and a half days; this is considered a common cause variation. His completion time would not have deviated very much from the mean since you would have had to consider the fact that he could submit it a little late.

Here’s another example: you estimate 20 minutes to get ready and ten minutes to get to work. Instead, you take five minutes extra to get ready because you had to pack lunch and 15 additional minutes to get to work because of traffic. 

Other examples that relate to projects are inappropriate procedures, which can include the lack of clearly defined standard procedures, poor working conditions, measurement errors, normal wear and tear, computer response times, etc. These are all common cause variation.

Special Cause Variation

Special Cause Variation, on the other hand, refers to unexpected glitches that affect a process. The term Special Cause Variation was coined by W. Edwards Deming and is also known as an “Assignable Cause.” These are variations that were not observed previously and are unusual, non-quantifiable variations.

These causes are sporadic, and they are a result of a specific change that is brought about in a process resulting in a chaotic problem. It is not usually part of your normal process and occurs out of the blue. Causes are usually related to some defect in the system or method. However, this failure can be corrected by making changes to affected methods, components, or processes.

Become a Certified Project Manager!

PMP® Certification Training CourseExplore Course

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?

Characteristics of special cause variation are:

  • New and unanticipated or previously neglected episode within the system
  • This kind of variation is usually unpredictable and even problematic
  • The variation has never happened before and is thus outside the historical experience base

On a control chart, the points lie beyond the preferred control limit or even as random points within the control limit. Once identified on a chart, this type of problem needs to be found and addressed immediately you can help prevent it from recurring.

Learn new trends, emerging practices, tailoring considerations, and core competencies required of a Project Management professional with the PMP Certification course.

Special Cause Variation Example

Let’s say you are driving to work, and you estimate arrival in 10 minutes every day. One day, it took you 20 minutes to arrive at work because you were caught in the traffic from an accident zone and were held up.

Examples relating to project management are if machine malfunctions, computer crashes, there is a power cut, etc. These kinds of random things that can happen during a project are examples of special cause variation.

One way to evaluate a project’s health is to track the difference between the original project plan and what is happening. The use of control charts helps to differentiate between the common cause variation and the special cause variation, making the process of making changes and amends easier.

Conclusion

This article has explained special cause variation vs common cause variation which are the two important concepts in project management when it comes to data validation. Simplilearn offers multiple Project Management training courses like the Post Graduate Program in Project Management and learning paths that can help aspiring project managers get the education they need to pass not only exams like the PMP certification and CAPM® but also real-world knowledge useful for any project management career.

PMP is a registered mark of the Project Management Institute, Inc.

Find our PMP® Certification Training Online Classroom training classes in top cities:

NameDatePlacePMP® Certification Training Course3 Jan -18 Jan 2023,
Weekdays batchYour CityView DetailsPMP Certification Training Course in Singapore7 Jan -4 Feb 2023,
Weekend batchSingaporeView DetailsPMP® Certification Training Course7 Jan -4 Feb 2023,
Weekend batchYour CityView Details

About the Author

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation in a process?
Avantika Monnappa

A project management and digital marketing knowledge manager, Avantika’s area of interest is project design and analysis for digital marketing, data science, and analytics companies.

What is the difference between natural and assignable variation?

Random variation: Natural variations in the output of process, created by countless minor factors, e.g. temperature, humidity variations. Assignable variation: A variation whose source can be identified. This source is generally a major factor, e.g. tool failure.

What is the difference between natural or common causes and special or assignable causes of process variation?

What are common-cause variation and special-cause variation? Some degree of variation will naturally occur in any process. Common-cause variation is the natural or expected variation in a process. Special-cause variation is unexpected variation that results from unusual occurrences.

What are the two types of process variation?

There are two types of process variation:.
Common cause variation is inherent to the system. This variation can be changed only by improving the equipment or changing the work procedures; the operator has little influence over it..
Assignable cause variation comes from sources outside of the system..

What is assignable cause variation?

An assignable cause is a source of variation that is intermittent, not predictable. It is sometimes called "special cause" variation. On a control chart, an assignable cause is signaled by points beyond the control limits or nonrandom patterns within the control limits.